Entre les Réalités

http://www.dedefensa.org/article/ma-foi-du-charbonnier No one can say precisely what’s beyond its reach. Our System (Ph Grasset’s idea) has control on many aspects of our lives and the totalitarian pretence to control them all. The first important idea is that we have to go beyond our reach. System’s results are not so good. We see the end of natural ressources. We see people hating each other through sexual preferences, anti-racism, societal values, religions new and old. We see a bankrupt financial world holding its power because in history bankers issued more paper money than they had gold in their vaults. We see political world in the hands of the former. We see an intellectual world caring less and less about the people and more and more about the way they have to behave. Artificial intelligence in these people hands means only a stronger control of our lives. Transhumanism will be promoted as an industrial resource for only some people. Robotization will make the facto...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mzXXjiwlxmU&t=336s Chomsky asserts that socialism never existed, only depraved forms of it. I remember from a college course that Marx asserted that classes are at war with each other. The upper class oppresses the lower classes. The lower fight back and the conflict is solved into a synthesis. That’s presented as a law of history. He logically suggests to get out of this with a completely egalitarian society. No more classes, no more wars. I’m completely missing the transition between the two situations. If the war between classes is a law, it doesn’t have exceptions. Creating a society without warriors out of a war torn society sounds difficult to me to say the least. Therefore, I accept Chomsky’s point. Socialism was never implemented because nobody found a way to make that transition. Several tries were made and all failed. Peterson definition of marxism is the oppressed and oppressing classes or groups of people. Anyth...