Accéder au contenu principal

Erdogan va encore bouger



Sadly fascinating text ! I gather from it a few facts. The ongoing financial crisis in Turkey is from Erdogan’s making. His absolute power on his country and his economical beliefs stop him from correcting it. His allies are either reluctant to give him money (Russia) or short on their wallet (Qatar). Erdogan’s answer is « … we have our God ».
Erdogan’s belief in a neo Ottoman destiny forces him to enter Syria, Irak and Greece. He can’t give up this speech or he is politically toast so he has to expand his actions in Syrian and Irak.
With this in mind, he is an unreliable ally and a formidable enemy without any remorse or hesitation to lie, cheat, kill to make his gains.
The USA, Saudi Arabia (MBS in fact) and the Kurds have another agenda. The want to stop and destroy the Iranian influence in the region.  The PKK/YPK members are the pawns of the game with ISIS. The second justifies the help for the first. The aim is Iran and the play field is Syria.
They oppose Erdogan who is using them to distract his population for his economical woes.
My bet is that Erdogan will not cooperate with Syria. It would be giving up his neo-ottoman destiny, his big dream. This dream pushed him from a street thug to the absolute power in Turkey. Giving it up would be admitting that his life is a failure.
In a sense, he is in the position of Hillary Clinton who wanted since her youth to be the first female president of the USA. She failed and can’t accept it. Erdogan hasn’t failed yet. I think he will and will accuse anybody but himself of that failure.
Another point comes into my mind. He is a member of the Muslim Brotherhood. I can’t believe he quitted because there’s too much power with it. He is with his god so he can’t fail because he is following the orders of his god. When he’ll go bust, he’ll accuse traitors having destroyed the will of his god and make very graphic moves against the « traitors ».
I do hope I’m wrong.

Commentaires

Posts les plus consultés de ce blog

Marché de l'habillement

http://plunkett.hautetfort.com/archive/2018/04/25/rana-plaza-cinq-ans-apres-les-marques-impenitentes-6046316.html#more Le marché du prêt-à-porter est un succès du libéralisme économique le plus pur (laisser-faire, laisser-passer). Les marques se battent de plus en plus durement pour baisser leurs coûts de production et augmenter leurs marges. Cela se fait aux dépends des employés bengalis ou analogues. Cela se fait au dépend de toute l'industrie européenne de l'habillement. Cela tue comme le Rana Plaza l'a démontré. L'absence de réglementation sur les constructions dans ce pays est l'une des causes de ce désastre. L'âpreté au gain des marques en est une autre. Ces morts marquent le succès du marché libre et globalisé. Ceux qui comptent font des bénéfices. Une habile "communication" au sens moderne du terme (de mon temps c'était de la manipulation) force la clientèle à accepter une mode du jetable (nouvelle idée pour moi). Elle est baptisée &

Vanité des vanités

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-5NVtcoWPeI I disagree. Telling a lie is done by its creator upon its own merits. A liar is a self-made person. No one taught it how to do that. Surviving your own lies puts you above others. The Mary Sue characters are pictures in movies and comics created by authors dreaming they were that good and believing that reality and dream are the same thing. They’re telling their readers that they can be the same if they cease to be hindered in their capacities by white heterosexuals males. The Mary Sue characters are promises made to people feeling down and lost in our world with the belief that if they’re Marie Sues they’ll be okay. They’re being lied to by people lying to themselves to allow them to lie to themselves that if they were not oppressed they would be Mary Sue avatars. It doesn’t matter to such people because reality doesn’t exist. They’re truths, not a truth. They’re in a dream. Mark Twain wrote once about a Captain he dreamed

Les SJWs sont des NPCs codés par leur monde.

Quand les informations sont trop importantes en quantité, il devient physiquement impossible de toutes les lires sans parler de les comprendre. La stratégie usuelle pour faire face à ce genre d’inondation est ce qu’un « trader » appelait l’intuition. J’y vois ici une forme de sentiment qui dit OK ou pas OK. La première fois que j’en ai entendu parler c’était lors de l’introduction en grand du marché des actions dans la population. C’était le moment des « Reaganomics ». Elle a lourdement enrichi quelques uns. Tous les autres se sont lourdement appauvris. Un autre champ d’action de ce type d’intuition est l’internet. Il s’y trouve vraiment trop d’informations. Les limites de paywall ou les documents vraiment intéressants sont à priori exclus. Cela reste beaucoup trop pour un individu. Pire, les sites internet ne sont pas là pour informer à fond. Le problème existait avec les journaux qui m’ont toujours laissé rêveur. En une page ou deux, il y était toujours possible de d